Why has my GLP-1 stopped working?
Measured on 8 of 8Highest 6.6%
Sources last read
Report-stream questions
Choose a question to compare what people reported across 8 GLP-1 brands. These FDA reports show what patients and clinicians filed after a drug was used. They do not show how often an effect happens or prove that the drug caused it.
Measured on 8 of 8Highest 6.6%
Measured on 5 of 8Highest 11%
Measured on 2 of 8Highest 5.2%
All 8 measuredHighest 57%
| Product | Drug substance | Reports naming it |
|---|---|---|
| Zepboundsingle-dose pen, single-dose vial, and a multi-dose vial holding four 0.6 mL doses | tirzepatide | 70,141 reports |
| Mounjarosingle-dose pen, single-dose vial, and a multi-dose vial holding four 0.6 mL doses | tirzepatide | 93,975 reports |
| Trulicitysingle-dose pen at 0.75, 1.5, 3 or 4.5 mg — one strength per pen | dulaglutide | 88,332 reports |
| Ozempica 3 mL pen set to one of several doses, holding four doses | semaglutide | 66,161 reports |
| Rybelsusa 3 mg, 7 mg or 14 mg tablet | semaglutide | 7,379 reports |
| Wegovysingle-dose pen or syringe, one strength each; a four-dose pen at 2.4 mg | semaglutide | 21,044 reports |
| Saxendaa 3 mL pen set to 0.6, 1.2, 1.8, 2.4 or 3 mg | liraglutide | 10,040 reports |
| Victozaa pen set to 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 mg | liraglutide | 44,086 reports |
401,158 reports in total · read from FDA 2026-08-17 · FDA data last updated 2026-07-30
A side-effect page reads the FDA-approved label. It tells you what a trial measured, in a few thousand people, over a fixed number of weeks, with a known bottom half to the fraction. That is the better document for how often something happens, and it lives at the symptom questions and on each compound guide.
A page here reads the other document. Once a drug is on the market, anyone can file a report, and what gets filed is a different picture from what a trial recorded. It has no denominator and it cannot show cause. What it can show is which products collect which complaints, and where the labels are silent.
So a question earns a page here only when this snapshot answers it better than a label does. Most questions do not, and most of them are answered elsewhere on this site instead of here.
There is no denominator. Nobody knows how many people took each drug and did not file anything, so nothing in this section is a rate and nothing here is a risk. Every percentage is a share of that product’s own reports, and the words saying so travel with it.
The snapshot keeps each product’s 25 most-reported terms rather than all of them. A term missing from that list was either never reported or reported and ranked 26th, and there is no way to tell which. Those rows are published as ceilings and never as zeros, which means the gaps these pages show are the smallest gaps the data allows.
The method is set out in full on the dosing-error study, which is the same snapshot asked the question this section grew out of. How every source on this site is graded is on the sourcing methodology.
What a dose costs, and whether a plan covers it, is on the cost pages. What a label says about a missed dose or a schedule is on the dose pages. How long a pen keeps outside a fridge is on the storage pages. None of those is a report-stream question, and putting a thin version of them here would only compete with the pages that answer them properly.
Neither does this section answer anything about one person. A share of reports is a fact about a pile of paperwork. Whether something is happening to you, and what to do about it, belongs with a clinician who can see the rest of the picture.