Why has my GLP-1 stopped working?
Measured on 8 of 8Largest report share 6.6%
Sources last read
Questions from FDA reports
Choose a question to compare what people reported across 8 GLP-1 brands. These FDA reports show what patients and clinicians filed after a drug was used. They do not show how often an effect happens or prove that the drug caused it.
Measured on 8 of 8Largest report share 6.6%
Measured on 5 of 8Largest report share 11%
Measured on 2 of 8Largest report share 5.2%
All 8 measuredLargest report share 57%
| Product | Drug substance | Reports naming it |
|---|---|---|
| Zepboundsingle-dose pen, single-dose vial, and a multi-dose vial holding four 0.6 mL doses | tirzepatide | 70,141 reports |
| Mounjarosingle-dose pen, single-dose vial, and a multi-dose vial holding four 0.6 mL doses | tirzepatide | 93,975 reports |
| Trulicitysingle-dose pen at 0.75, 1.5, 3 or 4.5 mg — one strength per pen | dulaglutide | 88,332 reports |
| Ozempica 3 mL pen set to one of several doses, holding four doses | semaglutide | 66,161 reports |
| Rybelsusa 3 mg, 7 mg or 14 mg tablet | semaglutide | 7,379 reports |
| Wegovysingle-dose pen or syringe, one strength each; a four-dose pen at 2.4 mg | semaglutide | 21,044 reports |
| Saxendaa 3 mL pen set to 0.6, 1.2, 1.8, 2.4 or 3 mg | liraglutide | 10,040 reports |
| Victozaa pen set to 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 mg | liraglutide | 44,086 reports |
401,158 reports in total · read from FDA 2026-08-17 · FDA data last updated 2026-07-30
Our side-effect pages explain the FDA-approved labels. Trial figures count events among enrolled participants over a stated period. That makes them different from a share of submitted reports. You can find those figures in the symptom questions and on each compound guide.
These pages summarize reports filed after a drug was used. The report total is known, but the number of people treated is not available in this data. The figures describe reported events; they cannot estimate how often an event happens or establish its cause.
Use this section to understand a claim based on FDA report counts. Use the label and study pages for the outcomes measured in trials. Neither type of data predicts one person’s experience.
The missing number is how many people used each drug. Every percentage here divides an event count by that product’s report total, not by the number of people treated. It is a share of reports, not the chance of an event for a patient.
The snapshot keeps each product’s 25 most-reported terms rather than all of them. A term missing from that list was either never reported or reported outside the stored list. Those rows show upper bounds rather than zero counts. When bounds overlap, the data cannot establish which product has the larger share.
The method is set out in full on the dosing-error study, which is the same snapshot asked the question this section grew out of. How every source on this site is graded is on the sourcing methodology.
What a dose costs, and whether a plan covers it, is on the cost pages. What a label says about a missed dose or a schedule is on the dose pages. How long a pen keeps outside a fridge is on the storage pages. None of those is a report-stream question, and putting a thin version of them here would only compete with the pages that answer them properly.
Neither does this section answer anything about one person. A share of reports is a fact about a pile of paperwork. Whether something is happening to you, and what to do about it, belongs with a clinician who can see the rest of the picture.