Page last checked
Tesamorelin vs sermorelin
Tesamorelin is an approved American medicine. Sermorelin was one too, until FDA withdrew both of its approvals in 2009. That withdrawal is the reason sermorelin is made up by compounding pharmacies today, and it is the difference that shapes everything else on this page.
Source: Read from the two Egrifta labels on DailyMed, the Federal Register notice on the Geref withdrawal, and the published sermorelin trials
What matters first
Medically reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD · non-practicing medical reviewerReviewed 2026-08-13every number here is sourced
Tesamorelin and Sermorelin, line by line
11 authored lines, plus two read straight off the two records. Where a source says nothing, the cell says so rather than borrowing from the other column.
| Question | Tesamorelin | Sermorelin |
|---|---|---|
| Is it approved today | Yes. Sold as Egrifta SV and Egrifta WR | No. Both approvals were withdrawn on 18 June 2009 |
| What it is | A growth hormone-releasing factor analog | The first 29 amino acids of growth hormone-releasing hormone |
| What it is approved to treat | Excess belly fat in adults who have HIV and lipodystrophy. That one use, and nothing else | Nothing. The two uses it once held were pituitary testing and growth failure in children |
| Was either ever approved for aging or body shape in healthy adultsThe same for both | No | No |
| What the label says about weight | It says the drug is not approved for weight loss, and calls its effect on body weight neutral | There is no label, so there is nothing to say it either way |
| The dose | 1.4 mg once a day into the belly, on the Egrifta SV label | No label dose exists. The trials used 30 mcg per kg a day in children, and 0.5 or 1 mg twice a day in older men |
| Is that dose a flat amount or a per-kilogram one | Flat. 1.4 mg, whoever you are | Mostly per kilogram of body weight, which does not become a vial amount without a weight |
| Longest published human course | 26 weeks, in the trials both current labels rest their safety on | Twelve months in children. The one adult study ran 14 days |
| What the longest adult study measured | Belly fat, IGF-1 and blood sugar, over 26 weeks | Hormone levels over 14 days. Not body shape, strength, sleep or anything a person would notice |
| Presentations sold | Two. Egrifta SV holds 2 mg a vial and Egrifta WR holds 11.6 mg, and their labels say the two are not swappable | Four vial strengths, split across pharmacy and research channels |
| Does either have a boxed warningThe same for both | No | No |
| Strength of evidence | FDA label | limited human data |
| Published dose rows | 1 row, each carrying its own source | 4 rows, each carrying its own source |
Has anyone tested Tesamorelin against Sermorelin directly?
No. No trial has put these two against each other, so nothing on this page is a measured difference between them.
Each was studied on its own, in different people, for different lengths of time. Setting two separate studies side by side and subtracting one from the other is the standard mistake with a pair like this, and the gap it produces can be bigger than any real gap between the two.
So each record below is reported on its own terms, with its own citation, and the two are never put on one chart.
7Comparison details
What has been reported to the FDA about each?
Tesamorelin: 3,517 reports. Sermorelin: 59 reports. Both were read from FDA’s side-effect report system on 2026-08-17.
| Name searched | Reports filed | Product names those reports arrived under |
|---|---|---|
| Tesamorelin | 3,517 reports | EGRIFTA · EGRIFTA SV · EGRIFTA WR |
| Sermorelin | 59 reports | SERMORELIN · SERMORELIN ACETATE · SERMORELIN ACETATE. |
What Tesamorelin reports are about
- Product dose omission issue — 299 reports, 8.5% of Tesamorelin reports
- Arthralgia — 268 reports, 7.6% of Tesamorelin reports
- Injection site pain — 255 reports, 7.3% of Tesamorelin reports
- Drug ineffective — 191 reports, 5.4% of Tesamorelin reports
- Weight increased — 189 reports, 5.4% of Tesamorelin reports
Sermorelin has too few reports for a breakdown to mean anything, so none is published here. A list of the most-named reactions out of a handful of reports would read like a pattern and would be noise.
The difference between the two sets of FDA reports is not proof of a safety difference. It mainly reflects how the products and terms are reported.
Tesamorelin has a manufacturer, and a manufacturer that hears about a serious reaction is obliged to pass it to FDA. Sermorelin has no manufacturer of an approved product, because there is no approved product. A compounding pharmacy is not under the same duty, and a person injecting something bought online has nobody prompting them to file.
So the smaller number here is a measure of who is watching, not of what happens. Read the other way round it is the more useful fact: for one of these two, somebody is counting.
Tesamorelin: patient.drug.openfda.generic_name:"tesamorelin" OR patient.drug.medicinalproduct:"tesamorelin" OR patient.drug.openfda.brand_name:"EGRIFTA" OR patient.drug.medicinalproduct:"EGRIFTA" · Sermorelin: patient.drug.medicinalproduct:"sermorelin"
The withdrawal is the reason sermorelin is on pharmacy shelves
Geref was a real American medicine twice over. FDA approved the first version in December 1990 for testing whether the pituitary can release growth hormone, and a second version in September 1997 for growth failure in children.
EMD Serono stopped selling both in 2008, and the approvals were withdrawn on 18 June 2009. FDA later put on record that neither product had been pulled for reasons of safety or effectiveness.
That finding is not a footnote. A medicine withdrawn that way leaves a compounding pathway open behind it, and a medicine withdrawn for safety does not. It is why sermorelin sits on pharmacy formularies while most peptides on this site do not.
Tesamorelin never left. So it is prescribed as itself, with a label a regulator has read, and it is not made up from a bulk substance.
The only one of the two with a label says it does not change weight
Both Egrifta labels say this plainly: the drug is not approved for weight loss because its effect on body weight is neutral.
That matters more than it first sounds. Both of these peptides are sold online for body shape. Only one of them has ever had that question put to a regulator, and the answer that came back was no.
Sermorelin has no label at all, so it makes no claim and refuses none. An absence of a claim is not a denial, and it is not support either.
Same receptor, and two records that cannot be subtracted
Both act at the same pituitary receptor, so it is tempting to line their numbers up. Doing that would be wrong, and the studies show why.
The Egrifta trials ran 26 weeks in adults with HIV and lipodystrophy. By week 26, IGF-1 had passed two standard deviations above normal in 47 in 100 people and three in 36 in 100. HbA1c reached 6.5% or higher in 5 in 100, against 1 in 100 on placebo. The label asks for both to be watched.
The one adult sermorelin study ran 14 days in healthy men of about 68. Only the 1 mg arm lifted growth hormone and IGF-I above the men’s own starting level. Serum phosphate rose. Blood sugar, blood pressure and blood counts did not move.
Different people, different lengths, different measurements. The gap between those two sets of numbers is the gap between two experiments, not between two drugs.
Ipamorelin is not the third option in this comparison
People often ask for these two alongside ipamorelin. It belongs in a different group. Tesamorelin and sermorelin both work at the growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor; ipamorelin works at the ghrelin receptor instead.
So it is not a stronger or weaker version of either. It pulls a different lever, which is why sellers pair it with them rather than offering it instead of them.
Its human evidence consists of two phase 2 trials in people recovering from bowel surgery, with doses given into a vein. Neither beat placebo on its main measure.
What about “Sermorelin vs tesamorelin”?
Same question, worded the other way round. This page answers it, and there is no second page for the reversed wording.
The other wordings people use for this pair — “Tesamorelin peptide vs sermorelin” — land here too. Publishing each ordering separately would mean near-identical pages competing with each other for one answer. One page per pair, and every phrasing reaches it.
The full record for each
This page is the difference between them. Each compound’s own dose rows, reaction list and regulatory note sit on its own page.
Tesamorelin FDA label
Sermorelin limited human data
- EGRIFTA SV (tesamorelin) for injection — FDA-approved Prescribing Information (DailyMed SPL)retrieved 2026-08-12FDA label
- EGRIFTA WR (tesamorelin) for injection — FDA-approved Prescribing Information (DailyMed SPL)retrieved 2026-08-12FDA label
- Determination That GEREF (Sermorelin Acetate) Injection, 0.5 Milligrams Base/Vial and 1.0 Milligrams Base/Vial, Was Not Withdrawn From Sale for Reasons of Safety or Effectiveness — 78 FR 14103 (4 March 2013)retrieved 2026-08-12FDA label
- Thorner M, et al. Once daily subcutaneous growth hormone-releasing hormone therapy accelerates growth in growth hormone-deficient children during the first year of therapy (Geref International Study Group). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1996;81(3):1189-96retrieved 2026-08-12Human trial
- Corpas E, Harman SM, Piñeyro MA, Roberson R, Blackman MR. Growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone-(1-29) twice daily reverses the decreased GH and insulin-like growth factor-I levels in old men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1992;75(2):530-5retrieved 2026-08-12Human trial
- NCT00324064 — Sexually Dimorphic Effects of GHRH in Adult Growth Hormone Testing (protocol: GHRH [Geref] 1 mcg/kg intravenous push, followed by arginine)retrieved 2026-08-12Human trial
- Dominikowski A, Rękoś Z, Olejarz M, Szczepanek-Parulska E, Domin R, Ruchała M. The emerging landscape of performance-enhancing peptides modulating GH-IGF1 axis: bridging the gap between clinical evidence and patient self-administration. Front Endocrinol 2026 — tabulates self-reported online dosing patterns beside the clinical doses, stating the reported values must not be read as clinically validated, regulatory-approved or saferetrieved 2026-08-12indirect evidence
- Lanes R, Carrillo E; Venezuelan Collaborative Study Group. Long-term therapy with a single daily subcutaneous dose of growth hormone releasing hormone (1-29) in prepubertal growth hormone deficient children. J Pediatr Endocrinol 1994;7(4):303-8retrieved 2026-08-12Human trial
- Dominikowski A, Rękoś Z, Olejarz M, Szczepanek-Parulska E, Domin R, Ruchała M. The emerging landscape of performance-enhancing peptides modulating GH-IGF1 axis: bridging the gap between clinical evidence and patient self-administration. Front Endocrinol 2026;17 — Table 1, sermorelin safety-signal rowretrieved 2026-08-12limited human data