A long count with nothing to check it against
The vial divides into thirty-three worked amounts. No published source gives a storage window, so that count should not be read as a schedule.
On the compounds in this family that do carry a window, a supply this long would be almost entirely discarded. Silence in the page is not evidence that it would not be.
Small readings, but at least they land
Both listed volumes give whole numbers of units, though both sit low on the barrel. The larger volume is the one that puts more marks between you and a mistake.
On the larger vial in this family neither of those things holds, which makes this the more measurable of the two sizes despite holding less.
The route this table models is the one that did least
Human responses to this peptide came from injections into a vein. Under the skin, the largest amount studied moved neither of the hormones being measured.
So the conversion below is exact and its subject is the route with the weakest evidence behind it. That is worth knowing before the count of draws feels like a plan.