No human muscle outcome
Bigger muscles
Four compounds changed or tested growth hormone in people. Across all six records, no study measured muscle size or lean mass.
Page last checked
Goal
Sellers offer six compounds on this site for muscle growth. Not one human study of any of them measured muscle.
Source: Based on 6 compound guides · checked 2026-08-12
The six names fall into two groups. Four have been given to people and mainly show a growth-hormone signal. The other two have no human dosing study.
That distinction answers more than a ranked list can. A hormone pulse is real. Muscle size, strength, performance and training recovery are different outcomes, and none appears in these sources.
Compounds covered
6
With published human dosing
4 of 6
Approved or being tested for this
0
No human evidence for this goal
2
Start with the outcome
Bigger muscles, more strength, faster recovery and better athletic performance are different outcomes. Choose the one you want to understand before comparing the studies.
No human muscle outcome
Four compounds changed or tested growth hormone in people. Across all six records, no study measured muscle size or lean mass.
No human performance outcome
None of the six has a human study reporting strength, power, endurance or athletic performance. A hormone reading cannot fill in those outcomes.
A different evidence question
The ipamorelin trials studied bowel function after surgery, not workout recovery. Injury and tissue-healing studies are covered on the recovery page.
Compare the recovery evidenceNever compared head to head
No study in these sources compares any of the six with an anabolic steroid. Sparse or missing data cannot establish a safer alternative.
Read the right-hand column looking for the word muscle. It does not appear, because no study on any of these six measured it. What the studies measured was a hormone.
| Compound | What people take it for | What research shows | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ipamorelin | Offered by clinics and sellers for muscle gain, as the cleanest of the growth-hormone peptides.Measured in a human study | It was built to raise growth hormone without the cortisol and prolactin spillover of the older compounds, and it does. Its two completed trials tested recovery of the gut after bowel surgery. Neither beat placebo, and neither weighed anybody’s muscle. | Human trialDose from a human trial · no FDA label |
| CJC-1295 | Sold for muscle, almost always stacked with ipamorelin, on the theory that two switches beat one.Measured in a human study | Two human studies exist and both measured growth hormone in the blood. One found that 60 and 90 mcg/kg did not differ from each other in effect. Most material sold under the name lacks the chemical arm that made the studied version last for days. | limited human dataDose from a human trial · no FDA label |
| Hexarelin | Pitched as the hardest-hitting of the growth-hormone peptides, for muscle and recovery.Measured in a human study | It is the one compound here dosed for a long course, and the result argues against the practice. Over 16 weeks the growth-hormone response fell from 19.1 to 10.5, then returned to 19.4 four weeks after stopping. A separate study found it raised 24-hour growth hormone without moving IGF-I at all. | limited human dataDose from a human trial · no FDA label |
| Sermorelin | Sold by wellness clinics for body composition, usually as part of a longer anti-aging package.Measured in a human study | Its largest trial ran in 110 children with growth-hormone deficiency, where height velocity rose from 4.1 to 8.0 cm/yr at six months. The one adult study ran 14 days in men of about 68, and only the 1 mg arm raised growth hormone above their own baseline. | limited human dataDose from a human trial · no FDA label |
| IGF-1 LR3 | Used on bodybuilding forums to grow muscle, usually on the back of a growth-hormone course.Reported use only | Its documented job is industrial. It is catalogued as a reagent for growing cells in tanks, where staying active is the selling point. No study of it in people has ever been registered. The change that makes it useful in a tank removes the body’s own brake on the signal. | no human dose shown to workDose reported in the literature only |
| PEG-MGF | Sold for muscle repair and growth after training, as a finisher to a growth-hormone course.Reported use only | Nobody has given it to a person in a study. The human research here takes muscle biopsies and measures what the body makes on its own, and even that work disagrees about whether training raises it. The peptide itself has only been put on cultured cells and mice. | no human dose shown to workDose reported in the literature only |
Four of these six have human pharmacology data. Researchers dosed volunteers, drew blood and measured a rise in growth hormone. That evidence is real, but it is not the same as proof of muscle growth.
What none of it does is close the loop. Between a hormone pulse and a bigger muscle sit sleep, food, training, IGF-I and time. The one study here that looked at IGF-I found hexarelin did not move it. A mechanism that fires is a reason to run the trial. It is not the trial.
Hexarelin also supplies the one long-course result on this page, and it points the wrong way for anyone dosing for months. The response nearly halved by week 16 and recovered only after stopping. Nobody turned that into a schedule, because nobody ran the study that would have to.
A trial that answered this question would run for months. It would feed and train everyone the same way, then measure lean mass against a placebo group. No such trial appears on any of these six records.
Nobody has given two of the six to a person in a registered study. Research on IGF-1 LR3 and PEG-MGF is limited to cells, animals and muscle samples from people who were not given either peptide.
Why no page here ranks anything
What PEG-MGF is, how it is used, and what has been studied
How hexarelin differs from the rest of its class
How IGF-1 LR3 differs from the rest of its class
Testosterone: the page beside the pitch
Which skin claims have a trial
How ipamorelin differs from the rest of its class
How CJC-1295 differs from the rest of its class